About

The most complete triathlon time, split, and pacing toolkit on the web.

Triathlon Regimen turns strong endurance-sport research into practical calculators that help athletes make better choices about training, pacing, and race execution.

What this site is trying to do well

Useful numbers, honest framing, and better triathlon decisions.

Triathlon training sits at the intersection of physiology, pacing, durability, logistics, and judgment. Many tools focus only on the first of those. Triathlon Regimen keeps the full context visible.

That means a calculator should not only produce a number. It should help the athlete understand what the number is good for, what assumptions it depends on, and where real life can push the result away from the model.

Product principle

The ideal output is not “a more impressive number.” The ideal output is “a better next decision.”

Build Principles

Build calculators around real athlete decisions, not vanity metrics.
Show where a number is research-backed and where it is only a practical heuristic.
Prefer clear assumptions over hidden “smart” adjustments.
Keep the experience lightweight, fast, and useful on mobile as well as desktop.

Self-coached age-group triathletes

The primary audience is athletes who want better pacing, threshold, fueling, and race-planning decisions without needing enterprise coaching software.

Coaches and reviewers

The calculators are also built to be inspectable. That means clearer formulas, visible assumptions, and pages that are easier to audit when something looks off.

Athletes who care about trust

Many endurance tools look polished but hide weak logic. Triathlon Regimen is being rebuilt to make method quality visible instead of decorative.

What Triathlon Regimen does not claim

The site does not claim that calculators replace medical advice, individualized coaching, or race-day judgment. It also does not claim that every endurance model is universally accurate across every athlete, course, condition, and training history.

Where the evidence is strong, the pages should say so. Where a section relies on a practical coaching heuristic, the page should say that too. The trust model is built around drawing that boundary clearly.

How pages are reviewed

Every calculator page is reviewed for formula quality, copy accuracy, mobile usability, consistency, and citation strength before publication.

Strong pages include clearer methodology notes, visible on-page assumptions, and practical exports or planning modes that athletes can use immediately.

Trust and next steps

The strongest pages should be easy to inspect as well as easy to use.